Webster defines abstract as: a.considered besides a certain instance, b.expressing an excellent independent of the object or c. having only intrinsic form with minimum pictorial representation. Put simply; taking an item and focusing on its core fundamentalness. All three definitions effortlessly fit abstract painting in showing, telling, drawing and painting ab muscles essence of the item without actually depicting the item itself.
So how exactly does an abstract painter arrive at an abstract design? Many stated that they started with a representational motif, that the motif was something readily identifiable. They dissected the motif as they say, searching for the bare bones, ab muscles essence of the object. They expressed this essence with colorful shapes, some beautiful, some drab, and some just plain ugly.
In any kind of painting the artist is creating a statement. It’s easy to say pretty pink flowers in a representational painting. What the abstract artist has to say must be said with his/her simple means; brush marks, color and interesting shapes. Also, since color is arbitrary, color are at the artist’s whim, and may or might not be pretty and has nothing related to the painting’s success https://joomlamarketingtips.com/large-abstract-paintings-painting-for-beginners/.
To make a meaningful statement with no recognizable subject is daunting. It’s not really a matter of simply looking and drawing. He/she must use each of their wiles to interact us in dialog with their art, being limited, or we should say, unlimited, with unrecognizable shapes and unrelated (to the object) color. The artist must interest and speak to the viewer through form and color.
A poor, wishy washy, pretty pink flower painting says, “Weak, wishy washy pretty pink flowers!” Bright, bold colors, without form and substance in a abstract painting says, “No form and no substance!” Neither painting is successful.
So….. here we stand facing the piece of art, having no knowledge of abstract art, its purpose and intention. We want to respond but we are with no clue. So, we hesitate facing the art work, we don’t understand what to say, we don’t react to the color or design, so, we disappear saying, or at least thinking, “That artist must be nuts!” And wondering what the painting was all about. The thing that was its purpose? Was it good art or not?
There are some folks who are of the opinion a painting must be representational to be good art. And if they can’t see every hair on the pinnacle and every leaf on the tree, then your art isn’t good. That only isn’t true. You might prefer the see every hair but that’s definitely not a sign of good art.
What guidelines do we’ve in judging abstract paintings merits? The guidelines that representational painters must follow are exactly the same for the abstract painter. The work must have readable values, color harmony and dominance, repetition with variety in shapes, colors and lines, all that concerns good art should also be in abstract art.
An accumulation wild colors and shapes does not always total up to good art in abstraction or representational art. A great abstract can be more difficult to accomplish than representational art as the artist is relying on his imagination and intuition to create something meaningful and of value. (not necessarily monetary value)
In attempting to understand abstract (non-representational) art, approach it with the theory in your mind to simply appreciate what is before you. Sometimes the title can give us a hint as to what the painting is about. That helps. Then look and observe how it affects you.
Does the color speak for you? Have you been lifted up or cast down by the color? You will have some reaction to an item of art work, it’ll move you in some manner, perhaps not much, perhaps a great deal. Identify what it is. Good art, whether abstract or representational, sets a mood, tells a story, however subtle, intrigues and interests the viewer, and as such, each painting must be appreciated on its own merits.